[PyKDE] signatures for qt-classes?
gordon at doxxx.net
Sun Sep 14 18:58:01 BST 2003
Phil Thompson wrote:
> On Sunday 14 September 2003 10:51 am, holger krekel wrote:
>>However, i am missing two things, mainly docstrings and
>>signature information. While i can imagine that providing
>>docstrings is a major task i wonder if it's possible to
>>maintain a more telling signature than '*args'. I really like
>>to learn libraries from the cmdline (with rlcompleter2-completion)
>>and i think i am not alone.
>>Or is this "uncurable" with current binding-technologies?
> rlcompleter works fine with PyQt as far as I know.
I think the problem is more that there are no docstrings in the PyQt
bindings. I was actually wondering myself whether it would be possible
to automatically generate docstrings based on the docs in the C++ comments?
More information about the PyQt