<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 4:57 PM, Vicente Sole <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:sole@esrf.fr">sole@esrf.fr</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Quoting Darren Dale:<br>
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><div class="im">
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 2:40 PM, Darren Dale <<a href="mailto:dsdale24@gmail.com" target="_blank">dsdale24@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<br></div><div class="im">
One last point, however: I think Armando's suggestion of passing the object,<br>
and not the object's id(), coupled with Phil's patch, is the right solution:<br>
<br>
</div></blockquote>
<br>
At my side, passing the object was already fine on 64-bit without Phil's patch. It is under 32-bit that the check has to be made.<br>
</blockquote><div><br>Yes, I got confused and part of my post was noise. Phil's patch does not address passing an object to createIndex.<br></div></div><br>Darren<br>